Banksy’s work is seen by Jones to be mild with a welcoming familiarity.Jones also claims that the conservationist style used by Banksy is a display of laziness and that his work does not deserve the incredible attention it has been receiving from the public.Tags: Can Parents Protect Their From Tv Violence EssayDo You Double Space Common App EssayCritical Thinking Questions For Middle SchoolArt And Critical ThinkingResearch Papers In Economics RepecHow Does Safe Assign WorkMath Problem Solving 4th GradeTeam Based Problem Solving
In concluding the review, the critic denounces Banksy’s creations as works of art and generally sees the rise of Banksy as the fall of art.
She sees this in how he uses opportunities that present in the form of the physicality of a site.
Banksy the self styled British graffiti artist has produced works that have over the past few years been the subject of critical acclaim.
His politically inspired artwork has gone ahead to attract millions of dollars at auctions and his pseudonymous character has made him a modern legend.
She proceeds to detail his Los Angeles exhibition and according to her, the paintings could have had more impact in their original location; on billboards and walls.
She suggests that Banksy’s paintings have power on location and generally tend to lose their appeal when transferred onto canvas.
He claims that Banksy’s work has a certain level of insincerity that can be mistaken for sophistication unlike Cartrain who spends time to give his work meaning.
He (Jones) thinks that Banksy does not put much thought into his work and just speaks out his mind on impulse to the extent that his work loses the darkness associated with the underground culture.
From the way he carries out his work, Jones labels Banksy a guerilla conceptualist whose humor works effectively both in the streets and in galleries.
He however sees Banksy’s humor as too one dimensional and dark-sided to last long in a museum gallery and attributes this to the fact that Banksy did not go to college.