With Mc Donalds, they made 2,278.5 million dollars in profits for the year of 2004. They could certainly afford to distribute that money to their employees. The only people that benefit from profits are investors, and investors are not the working class that essentially run the company.Moral Libritarian, lowes employees own about half the lowes stock.In this day and age, companies pay people salaries, 401k's, health benefits, and any other little things.
The law allows corporations to deliver to consumer’s table cheap but dangerous food.
Any corporation, if it was a real person, would be unsociable, intractable, authoritarian, and not prone to long-term relationships.
However, in such dense networks that depend on the decisions of many people, relying on the moral qualities of each of them is a utopia.
Yet, one of the possible effective solutions could be tougher legislation in this area, and reduction of the influence of corporations on government.
Main steps in making moral decisions are analysis of moral situation, definition of the problem, comparison of options, assessment of consequences, and making the decision.
Correctness of the decision depends on the individual’s knowledge of the issue, which, in turn, relies on personal moral experience and moral culture.The film in question is an unflattering overlook of the US food industry and corporations that control it.The author investigates the industrial production of meat, grains and vegetables, showing viewers how inhumane and environmentally unfriendly this process is now.And nobody would start a business, afford the risks of bankruptcy, if they don't have the chance of being rich. If I don't pay my workers well enough, then they leave for better job opportunities, and I get hosed.Large profits from big corporations can be solved easily. If I overcharge, then one of my competitors gets all my sales, and once again, I'm hosed.The film presents a standard and one of the most important moral dilemmas of modern society – the choice between public good and private gain.Of course, one could say that there is an easy way out – to follow one’s moral principles and collectively decide to refuse from substance and technology dangerous for the environment and human.Accumulating moral experience of a person, intuition in a way replaces the missing opportunity to assess all the pros and cons for each of the options for action (Holmes, 2007).All three mechanisms complement each other, and only the adequacy of one of them to a specific situation allows making a moral decision.Moral decision-making involves such mechanisms of ethical consciousness as sense, reason, and intuition.While sense successfully functions in solving relatively simple moral problems (with common, patterned acts), it gives way to reason that makes creative moral decisions.