You can view samples of our professional work here.Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.If nurses are to improve their practice, and apply evidence to improve their clinical and theoretical knowledge and skills, they must be able to assess the quality of the available research which is relevant to their practice (Freshwater and Bishop, 2003k p23; Hek, 2000, p 19).Tags: Essay 7 ParagraphsOnline Database Of DissertationsEnglish Essay About My Best FriendBest Homework AnswersHow Do I Write A Conclusion Paragraph For An EssayDissertation Evaluation
Ambiguity and irony presented in the paper could be targets as well.
"The critique is the process of objectively and critically evaluating a research report's content for scientific merit and application to practice, theory, and education, write Geri Lo Biondo-Wood and Judith Haber. "In other words, a critique is a balanced appraisal, not a hatchet job." ("How to Read a Scientific Article." In "Communicating Science: Professional Contexts," ed. Taylor & Francis, 1998) Arguments by the reviewer also need to be backed up with evidence.
Nurses are expected to provide the best standards of care possible for their patients and clients, and in order to do this, they are required to provide evidence-based practice wherever possible.
Part of this process of providing care based on the best available evidence involves appraising primary research (Elliott, 2001, p 555).
This would then help the reader to identify if this is the type of research study that would be applicable to their own practice or learning. Authors The authors’ qualifications are provided, and they all are registered nurses, all of which have postgraduate degrees, and two of which have doctorates.
They all work within nursing education within a University context.Imagine that someone has circulated a memorandum arguing that your company retain your current legal counsel.You, however, are convinced that it is time for a change, and want to demonstrate that....The study effectively summarises the research, by identifying the variables being tested.The authors do not, however, present the hypothesis in the abstract (Cormack, 2000).Title The title is concise (Cormack, 2000) and describes the focus of the research itself.While it clearly indicates what the purpose of the study was (Cormack, 2000), it could be clearer and more indicative of the nature of the study."It requires some knowledge of the subject matter and knowledge of how to critically read and use critiquing criteria." ("Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice." Elsevier Health Sciences, 2006) "A critique should emphasize first what the article contributes to the field and then identify the shortcomings or limitations," write authors H. It isn't enough just to say that the paper in question is flawed but also how it's flawed and why—what's the proof that the argument won't hold up?A critique is not the same as a demonstration that the conclusion of someone's argument is false.But in order to identify this ‘best evidence’, the nurse must undertake an evaluation and critical review of research studies, to see if the research is useful and of sufficient quality to be applied to their practice (Fink, 2005).This essay evaluates a quantitative research article which has relevance to nursing practice, because it deals with a chronic condition and one which is prevalent in worldwide populations.