Separate from the policy side of this story, there's a critical legal issue here that hasn't yet been resolved: The AP story reports that one of the objections lodged by counsel for the defendants is that the new rules violate the defendants' constitutional right to counsel.
Separate from the policy side of this story, there's a critical legal issue here that hasn't yet been resolved: The AP story reports that one of the objections lodged by counsel for the defendants is that the new rules violate the defendants' constitutional right to counsel.Tags: The Assignment FilmEssay Outline Graphic Organizer Middle SchoolDiversity Art EssayEssay On Moses MaimonidesEssay Character Analysis Kill MockingbirdHogan Lovells Online Critical Thinking TestBusiness Resumption Plan
Further, as you practice it, (and as we show you below) you will find yourself improving the analysis section significantly in order to write a sophisticated exam answer.
It is important that you identify most, if not all, of the issues in your exam fact pattern. Explicitly say, “The issue is whether…” Note that many times, the fact pattern will not give you any hints as to what the issues are.
If you have outlines, but are struggling to learn or “memorize” them, you are not alone.
Many students struggle with this aspect of studying.
But it's also one that I would hope is relatively easy to answer.
Whether or not non-citizens held outside the territorial United States are entitled to affirmatively invoke individual constitutional rights in litigation against the federal government (an issue on which reasonable people will surely disagree), it seems to me an entirely different matter when those rights are invoked defensively in criminal proceedings initiated by the U. government, be they civilian trials or military commissions.But I have to think we'll keep having flashpoints--issues where the Sixth Amendment question lurks in the background--until and unless the Article III courts have their say...Steve Vladeck is a professor of law at the University of Texas School of Law.All these are instances of offenses committed against the United States, for which a penalty is imposed, but they are not deemed to be within Article III, § 2 or the provisions of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments relating to ‘crimes' and 'criminal prosecutions'.In the light of this long-continued and consistent interpretation we must concluded that § 2 of Article III and the Fifth and Sixth Amendments cannot be taken to have extended the right to demand a jury to trials by military commission, or to have required that offenses against the law of war not triable by jury at common law be tried only in the civil courts.Below the fold, I attempt to explain why this is, at minimum, an open question (albeit one that I think should be answered in the affirmative).To date, no court has reached the question of whether any of the Sixth Amendment applies at Guantanamo (, of course, appears to stand for the proposition that the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause does not apply).There's been a fair amount of media and blog attention to the proposed new rules governing (and substantially widening) the government's access to communications between military commission defendants and their counsel.The draft order (courtesy of the ) is here; the AP story is here; the ABA's letter of protest to Secretary Panetta is here.It will just say “Discuss the issues” or “Discuss.” Thus, it will be up to you to spot all of the issues.Issue-spotting is important because if you don’t spot the issue, you will not be able to apply the relevant law and analyze it (and this is what you get the most points for! To become a good issue-spotter, practice answering exam questions and comparing them to model answers.