in forced cooperation, leading to ultimate truth, utopia where no government would be required. Here's a prior answer that helps to explain what the terms thesis, antithesis, and synthesis is trying to get to: https://socratic.org/questions/what-is-hegel-s-concept-of-thesis-antithesis-and-synthesis-in-simple-terms?
in forced cooperation, leading to ultimate truth, utopia where no government would be required. Here's a prior answer that helps to explain what the terms thesis, antithesis, and synthesis is trying to get to: https://socratic.org/questions/what-is-hegel-s-concept-of-thesis-antithesis-and-synthesis-in-simple-terms?Tags: Research Paper Dust BowlHousekeeping Research PaperAudio Analysis ResynthesisLife In 999 A Grim Struggle EssayAp European History Essay ThesisUga Creative WritingEssay On Why I Want To Go To CollegeHow To Write A Book Review EssayElephant Writing Paper
Lenin, in the classical State and revolution, teaches us here that: “Engels expressed this splendidly in his letter to Bebel when he said, as the reader will remember, that "the proletariat needs the state, not in the interests of freedom but in order to hold down its adversaries, and as soon as it becomes possible to speak of freedom the state as such ceases to exist".
Democracy for the vast majority of the people, and suppression by force, i.e., exclusion from democracy, of the exploiters and oppressors of the people--this is the change democracy undergoes during the transition from capitalism to communism (...).
The thesis was capitalism unrestricted competition. For way more information on Hegel and Dialectics (this process we're talking about), check this out: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel-dialectics/ The question before us is Does This Stuff Work In Practice?
source=search This process harkens back to the days of Plato but Hegel added to it to help synthesize more varied and different types of arguments. Because as a way of thinking, it creates a process where contradictory information can be processed and utilized to create new, more sophisticated thoughts that in essence negate the original and less sophisticated ones.
In reality, according dialectical materialism, every process is a unity, a synthesis, consisting in the unity of the opposites.
The bourgeoisie and the working class are not moving to a “collision” : the French revolutionary syndicalism is here a terrible caricature of such a misconception.The working class can not “decide” to make the revolution – it is a part of the mode of production, mode of production which is united and which is limited in time, because of inner transformations of reality itself.Let's quote Mao Zedong which is very precise here: “The socialist system will eventually replace the capitalist system; this is an objective law independent of man's will.However much the reactionaries try to hold back the wheel of history, eventually revolution will take place and will inevitably triumph.” “Changes in society are due chiefly to the development of the internal contradictions in society, that is, the contradiction between the productive forces and the relations of production, the contradiction between classes and the contradiction between the old and the new; it is the development of these contradictions that pushes society forward and gives the impetus for the suppression of the old society by the new.” In this second quote, we have to understand that the contradiction between the old and the new is the universal law of matter in movement.In our case, the contradiction between the productive forces and the relations of production is the main aspect, the contradiction between classes is the secondary aspect, its own base being the main aspect.It is a process of reorganizing the society, on all levels, with dialectical materialism taking command in every field.It is incorrect to imagine that the dictatorship of the proletariat is a transition before socialism – it is actually a part of socialism itself.The contradiction between classes is not “abstract”, with metaphysical classes being “thesis” and “antithesis” like revolutionary Syndicalism and Leftism try to explain it.There is actually a mode of production, as unity of opposites.In fact, it is Fascism who intervenes in unifying antithetical poles.The famous Chinese document on “1 becomes 2” is here very useful to reject the “2 becomes 1” principle.